How Long To Travel To The Moon?

How Long To Travel To The Moon

about 3 days It takes about 3 days for a spacecraft to reach the Moon. During that time a spacecraft travels at least 240,000 miles (386,400 kilometers) which is the distance between Earth and the Moon. The specific distance depends on the specific path chosen.

How long does it take a human to get to the Moon?

How long does it take to send an unmanned spacecraft to the moon? — Even for unmanned space probes, there is no such thing as a consistent travel time… It all depends on whether the spacecraft is just passing by the Moon, whether it is intended to be placed into orbit or to land on the surface.

Spacecraft Launch Date Flight Duration
Luna 1 January 2, 1959 34 hours (flyby)
Luna 2 September 14, 1959 34-35 hours
Luna 3 October 7, 1959 3 days
Ranger 7 30 July 1964 2 days
New Horizons January 20, 2006 8 hours and 35 minutes
SMART-1 November 11, 2004 1 year and 1 month and two weeks

In summary, the time it takes to reach the Moon is about 3 days on average for manned spacecraft. On the other hand, for unmanned spacecraft, the travel time can vary considerably depending on the mission objectives. They usually reach their destination much faster. I eagerly look forward to the launch of the next lunar mission scheduled for 2024. Mankind will return to the lunar surface for the first time in 40 years! And this time, a woman will be part of the crew! How amazing! Is it possible that 40 years of technological progress will significantly reduce the time it takes to reach the Moon? Perhaps the new private space companies, such as SpaceX, Virgin Galactic and Blue Origin, will beat all previous records? We’ll find out the answer in a few years…! How Long To Travel To The Moon I’ve been fascinated by space and astronomy from a very young age. When I’m not watching space-themed documentaries, movies or TV series, I spend most of my free time in my backyard admiring the planets and galaxies with my telescope.

How long did it take to get to the Moon in 1969?

The first crewed mission to reach the Moon The Apollo 11 mission in 1969, crewed by three astronauts took four days, six hours and 45 minutes.

Does it take 6 months to get to the Moon?

Asked by: Matt B, Glastonbury Astronomer Fred Hoyle was the first to point out that if you could drive a car upwards at 95km/h (60mph), it would only take about an hour to get into space. To get to the Moon would take a little longer though, since it’s 400,000km (250,000 miles) away — around 10 times the circumference of the Earth. Your only real problem (apart from the lack of air for your lungs and for burning the petrol) would be finding a garage to refuel — and that has a loo! Read more:

  • How old is the ‘Man in the Moon’?
  • Why is the Moon moving away from us?

Why does it take 3 days to get to the Moon?

Shining brightly overhead most nights, we often take the moon for granted. Our nearest celestial neighbor and satellite has a lot more impact in our lives than we realize though, helping affect the tides , animal sleep cycles (including humans !), and hormones.

It has also long inspired us to look up and reach beyond the atmosphere of our own planet; that’s part of why President John F. Kennedy set his sights and NASA’s mission objective on the moon in the 1960s.

So far, American astronauts have made nine journeys to the moon – six of which landed on the lunar surface. Based on this data, we now have a good idea about how long it takes to get to the moon. NASA, other governments, and other private companies are now planning crewed missions back to the moon and will give us even more data about how long it takes to reach the moon.

  1. Like other orbiting bodies in space, the moon’s orbit is not exactly circular; it is elliptical;
  2. This means that the moon is closer to Earth at some times and further than others – that’s why we keep hearing about » supermoons » when the moon is closer;

(The point of orbit when the moon is closest to Earth is called perigee ; the point of orbit when it is furthest away from Earth is called apogee). Taking advantage of orbital mechanics, astrophysicists can plan lunar missions to coincide when those times that the moon is closer to Earth.

Historically, most lunar missions have taken about three days to reach the moon, assuming the moon is at an ideal distance of 240,000 miles (386,243 kilometers) away. This means astronauts travel roughly 3,333 mph (5,364 kph) on their journey to the moon.

Some uncrewed missions have taken longer in an attempt to save on fuel weight (such as China’s Chang’e missions which have taken four to five days each ). The fastest-ever mission to the moon was the very first one: 1959’s unmanned Luna 1 took just 36 hours at a speed of roughly 6,500 mph (10,500 kph).

What planet takes 7 years to get to?

FAQ — Spacecraft

Spacecraft Target Time
Messenger Mercury 6. 5 years
Cassini Saturn 7 years
Voyager 1 & 2 Jupiter; Saturn; Uranus; Neptune 13,23 months; 3,4 years; 8. 5 years; 12 years
New Horizons Pluto 9. 5 years

.

How long is trip to Mars?

This shows an artist’s concept animation of the Perseverance cruise stage cruising to Mars. DISTANCE TRAVELED Loading. Loading. miles / km DISTANCE REMAINING Loading. Loading. miles / km The cruise phase begins after the spacecraft separates from the rocket, soon after launch. The spacecraft departs Earth at a speed of about 24,600 mph (about 39,600 kph).

  • The trip to Mars will take about seven months and about 300 million miles (480 million kilometers);
  • During that journey, engineers have several opportunities to adjust the spacecraft’s flight path, to make sure its speed and direction are best for arrival at Jezero Crater on Mars;

The first tweak to the spacecraft’s flight path happens about 15 days after launch.

Is the flag still on the Moon?

How Long To Travel To The Moon Image caption, John Young salutes the flag while jumping in this picture taken by Charles Duke on the Apollo 16 mission Images taken by a Nasa spacecraft show that the American flags planted in the Moon’s soil by Apollo astronauts are mostly still standing. The photos from Lunar Reconaissance Orbiter (LRO) show the flags are still casting shadows — except the one planted during the Apollo 11 mission. This matches Buzz Aldrin’s account of the flag being knocked over by engine exhaust as Apollo 11 lifted off.

  • LRO was designed to produce the most detailed maps yet of the lunar surface;
  • Each of the Apollo missions that touched down on the Moon planted an American flag in the soil;
  • Scientists had previously examined photos of the landing sites for these flags, and had seen what looked like shadows cast by them on the lunar surface;

But this was not considered conclusive. Now, researchers have studied photos of the same areas taken at different points during the day and have observed shadows circling the points where the flags are thought to be. Prof Mark Robinson, the chief scientist for the spacecraft’s camera instrument, LROC, said in a blog entry: «From the LROC images it is now certain that the American flags are still standing and casting shadows at all of the sites, except Apollo 11.

  1. » The Arizona State University scientist added: «The most convincing way to see that the flags are still there, is to view a time series of LROC images taken at different times of day, and watch the shadow circle the flag;

» «Personally I was a bit surprised that the flags survived the harsh ultraviolet light and temperatures of the lunar surface, but they did. What they look like is another question (badly faded?)» LRO began its mission in lunar orbit in September 2009, to identify mineral and other resources on the Moon as well as scout promising landing sites for future missions.

Can you get pregnant in space?

When we think about the difficulties of colonising another planet, the last thing we probably worry about about is sex. However, for our species to survive beyond Earth it’s a fundamental issue. While no astronauts have admitted having sex in space, plenty of reproduction has been going on.

  1. This is because a range of animals from fruit flies to fish – as well as their eggs, sperm and embryos – have been sent into space so we can study how they reproduce;
  2. While these studies indicate that the first stages of reproduction in space are possible, other research suggests that lower gravity may slow down the development of the embryo;

Many of these studies have been based on IVF using sperm and eggs in orbit. Embryos and already pregnant animals have also been sent to space. However, we have yet to see the entire process of an animal in space getting pregnant, going through a normal pregnancy and having healthy babies up there, so there is still a long way to go.

  1. Of particular interest to space agencies, astronauts and scientists are the effects of radiation on reproduction;
  2. Space is full of highly energetic particles which can damage our DNA;
  3. On Earth, thanks to our atmosphere, our exposure to this type of radiation is about 100 times lower than at the International Space Station (ISS);

Now a new study, published in PNAS , has investigated the effects of space radiation on male reproduction by blasting mouse sperm up to the ISS. The first issue for the researchers was how best to get the sperm up there. They decided to have the sperm freeze-dried, just like instant coffee.

This meant the sperm weighed almost nothing and could be kept at room temperature, ideal for travel on a rocket, or a distant planet. The mouse sperm then spent 288 days on the ISS before coming back to Earth to be compared with fresh sperm from the same mice.

First the scientists analysed how space travel affected the integrity of the DNA within the sperm. We know that high levels of fragmentation of sperm DNA is associated with male infertility. As expected, the scientists discovered that the space sperm had higher amounts of fragmented DNA than the sperm which had stayed on Earth.

However, when used to fertilise a mouse egg, the space sperm resulted in a similar number of healthy embryos being generated – and these offspring had the ability to develop into normal, fertile adult mice.

A final test the researchers did was to compare the patterns of genes being expressed within the brains of the adult mice. Here, the researchers saw no overall differences and concluded the space sperm were equally capable of generating offspring. The minimal effect on fertility in these highly controlled studies seems to match observations on the fertility of astronauts coming back from space.

However, this is the first study to look directly at how space travel damages sperm. So it seems short-term space travel is OK for sperm quality. It somehow seemed that the damaged space sperm was «repaired» when fertilising the egg, which was from young, healthy mice.

This suggests eggs can compensate for sperm of poorer quality, mending damaged DNA and ensuring the development of the embryo. However, it would be interesting to see whether eggs, which have been into space, would also mend poor quality sperm just as well. Lab mouse. Rama/wikipedia , CC BY-SA Indeed, if humans are to colonise another planet, both men and women will be needed. Another factor to think about is age. With increasing age comes increasing DNA damage to our cells. Unfortunately, as eggs age, their ability to repair damaged DNA , either their own or that of the sperm, decreases.

How long did it take Neil Armstrong to get back to Earth?

After a flight of 195 hours, 18 minutes, 35 seconds — about 36 minutes longer than planned — Apollo 11 splashed down in the Pacific Ocean, 13 miles from the recovery ship USS Hornet.

How long will it take to go to Pluto?

In which we marvel at just how profound it is that NASA’s New Horizons is set to pass the icy dwarf planet. Given the relatively small size of our planet in terms of cosmic things, our earthling brains can have a hard time grasping really long distances.

  1. The almost 25,000 miles around the planet, that makes sense;
  2. That the moon, on average, is 238,855 miles away;
  3. this isn’t too hard to fathom;
  4. But when we start inching our way out into the solar system, it starts to get a bit profound;

Take Pluto. NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft is set to swoop by Pluto this month, which is (on average) 39 Astronomical Units (AU) away. An AU is the distance by which astronomers measure distances; it’s based on the distance between the Earth and our big star, about 93 million miles.

Which puts Pluto at a distance of 3. 7 billion miles away. Honestly, even a billion is hard to get one’s mind around. Yes, it’s one thousand millions, but what’s that like in more practical concepts? A billion minutes ago, the Roman Empire was going strong.

A billion hours ago, the Stone Age was doing its thing. So, 3. 7 billion miles. How can we relate to that kind of mileage? Adam Frank at NPR asked the same question and decided to calculate it in terms that most of us are familiar with: driving. Using the simplest calculation – a straight line from Earth to Pluto, ignoring the motion of each planet, and driving at a steady 65 miles per hour – he figured it would take.

  • 6,293 years;
  • «Of course, a 6,293-year-long road trip is not something you want to try with little kids;
  • The asteroid belt is nothing but tourist traps and the rest stops really thin out after Saturn,» Frank writes, so he also gives up the calculation were we to fly by Boeing 777;

With a maximum velocity of 590 miles per hour, the trip to Pluto will only take about 680 years. Which really puts things into perspective when considering just how wild it is that we have a spacecraft about to reach Destination Pluto. Launched in January of 2006, it now travels at more than 50,000 miles per hour.

How long is a trip to space?

Short answer: A few minutes. Long answer: The semi-official «start of space» is 100 km above sea level. This is called the Kármán line. Most rockets get to this point within a few minutes of launch, but it takes longer to reach their final orbit (or other destination). Here are a couple of examples:

  • Space Shuttle: Kármán line in 2½ minutes, orbit in 8½ minutes.
  • SpaceX Falcon Heavy: Kármán line in 3½ minutes.

Notes:

  • It can take anywhere from 6 hours to 3 days to get to the International Space Station, depending on the spacecraft and mission profile.
  • It took the Apollo astronauts about three days to get to the Moon. Although the Moon is much farther away than the ISS, the Apollo spacecraft travelled more directly and quickly.

Can you drive a car on the Moon?

When the Apollo astronauts drove around on the moon, they had to settle for a little buggy. But if you want to tour the Sea of Tranquility in the family SUV or a Ferrari, well, you’re looking at more than a few weekends under the hood. «Your average car faces several major problems on the moon,» says Brian Wilcox, who heads the development of NASA’s new manned rover, called Athlete [see NASA’s Gilded Chariot].

Chief among those is the small matter of combustion. There’s no oxygen on the moon, so your engine can’t burn fuel to generate power. In addition, your rubber tires would crack or melt on the surface, where temperatures range from that of liquid nitrogen to boiling water.

The upgrades are fairly straightforward. You could swap your Firestones for a set of NASA’s metal mesh lunar-grade tires. You’d need to get rid of that combustion engine, too. An electric engine running on hydrogen fuel cells would perform best in the lunar environment, Wilcox says.

  1. You’d want to keep your trips brief, though;
  2. On the surface of the atmosphere-free moon, there’s no protecting yourself from cosmic rays, which at lunar-intensity levels can increase your risk of developing cancer by 3 percent in just six months;

If you’re the cautious type, you might consider two-inch-thick, water-filled panels to block the protons spewed from the occasional solar flare, which could kill you in less than an hour. Once you’d made these modifications, you would reap some nice benefits.

Because gravity on the moon is one sixth that of Earth, your engine wouldn’t have to work as hard to propel your car, so you’d score six times as many miles per charge as you would here. And there’s never any traffic.

Of course, you’d have to get your car up there. NASA’s going freight rate to the moon runs around $25,000 a pound, so delivering a one-ton car would cost $50 million. Those two-seater buggies left behind from the Apollo missions don’t sound so bad after all..

How long was Apollo 11 flight to the Moon?

Apollo 11

Mission duration 8 days, 3 hours, 18 minutes, 35 seconds
Spacecraft properties
Spacecraft Apollo CSM-107 Apollo LM-5
Manufacturer CSM: North American Rockwell LM: Grumman
Launch mass 96,785 pounds (43,901 kg)

.

Why do we not go back to the Moon?

The U. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) landed 12 people on the Moon between 1969 and 1972 as a part of the Apollo project. Despite several subsequent policy initiatives by American presidents, however, no humans have landed on the Moon in the decades since.

  • The Apollo program was a costly endeavor for the United States;
  • While the cost of the program varies between historical sources, most agree that it cost at least $20 billion in 1973 dollars (the equivalent of about $116 billion in 2019);

At its peak in the mid-1960s, NASA consumed about 4 percent of annual federal spending, compared with roughly 0. 5 percent in recent years. $20 billion Cost of Apollo program in 1973 $116 billion Equivalent cost in 2019 dollars NASA initially planned to send human missions to the Moon through Apollo 20 and then adapt its Moon mission technology for other exploration through the Apollo Applications Program (AAP).

Congressional cutbacks in NASA allocations, however, accelerated the end of the Moon program to Apollo 17, in 1972. Most AAP programs were shelved, with the exception of the space station Skylab. There are many reasons why Congress reduced funding to NASA.

The initial impetus to go to the Moon came from the space race, a competition between the Soviet Union and the United States to show technological and military superiority to other nations. Later in the 1960s, however, the mood of competition cooled to détente, removing the strategic urgency of investing in NASA.

  • Other public priorities were also coming to the fore, high among them the expensive Vietnam War that required a large share of federal funds;
  • Public interest in space also faded after the first human Moon landing, Apollo 11, on July 20, 1969;

Space historians Roger D. Launius and Howard E. McCurdy further argue, in their 1997 book Spaceflight and the Myth of Presidential Leadership , that Apollo arose because of a unique circumstance. Specifically, U. Pres. John F. Kennedy pursued the space program and Moon landings as one of the chief policies of the United States, due to concern about Soviet military capabilities.

After détente, NASA and its programs moved to ancillary policy and have remained there ever since. In line with congressional desires, NASA’s priorities changed in the coming decades and its more limited human spaceflight money went to projects other than Moon exploration.

The next major initiative after Apollo was the partially reusable space shuttle, whose five space vehicles flew 135 missions between 1981 and 2011. NASA also worked on various space station concepts that eventually culminated in it contributing to the International Space Station (ISS), whose first pieces were launched in 1998.

The ISS was billed partly as a science laboratory and partly as an international policy platform—especially with Russia, which was then a new nation just establishing itself after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Three presidents have proposed new Moon initiatives over the decades, but most ideas were abandoned due to funding and waning congressional will. These were George H. Bush’s Space Exploration Initiative to land humans by the turn of the century, and George W.

Bush’s Vision for Space Exploration advocating for Moon missions by 2020. Both initiatives were terminated shortly after each president finished his term. The current administration of Donald Trump has two major Moon initiatives planned: the Gateway lunar space station and Project Artemis, aiming for human landings by the year 2024.

In June 2019 NASA administrator Jim Bridenstine told reporters that the new Moon landings under Project Artemis could cost NASA between $20 billion and $30 billion in current-day dollars. This would be much cheaper than the cost of Apollo, pegged in excess of $115 billion.

$30 billion Project Artemis could cost between $20 billion and $30 billion. Besides the United States and the Soviet Union, no nation in the 1960s had space programs sufficiently advanced to consider human Moon landings.

In recent years, however, China, India, Japan, Russia, and the countries within the European Space Agency have all publicly speculated on future Moon landings. NASA is soliciting its ISS partners for Artemis and Gateway collaborations. As of this writing, Canada is the only partner to commit; it has signed on to provide robotics to the Gateway.

Any country or agency that does choose to land people on the Moon will need to accept a certain amount of risk and budgetary commitment. Human Moon landings require more resources than robotic landings, since humans require water, oxygen, food, and other amenities to remain alive.

That said, several nations—including private companies from those nations—are working on robotic Moon initiatives that could support future human missions. Written by Elizabeth Howell Elizabeth Howell has reported and written on space for such outlets as Space.

How fast can a spaceship get to the Moon?

It takes about 3 days for a spacecraft to reach the Moon. During that time a spacecraft travels at least 240,000 miles (386,400 kilometers) which is the distance between Earth and the Moon. The specific distance depends on the specific path chosen.

Can you get pregnant in space?

When we think about the difficulties of colonising another planet, the last thing we probably worry about about is sex. However, for our species to survive beyond Earth it’s a fundamental issue. While no astronauts have admitted having sex in space, plenty of reproduction has been going on.

  1. This is because a range of animals from fruit flies to fish – as well as their eggs, sperm and embryos – have been sent into space so we can study how they reproduce;
  2. While these studies indicate that the first stages of reproduction in space are possible, other research suggests that lower gravity may slow down the development of the embryo;

Many of these studies have been based on IVF using sperm and eggs in orbit. Embryos and already pregnant animals have also been sent to space. However, we have yet to see the entire process of an animal in space getting pregnant, going through a normal pregnancy and having healthy babies up there, so there is still a long way to go.

Of particular interest to space agencies, astronauts and scientists are the effects of radiation on reproduction. Space is full of highly energetic particles which can damage our DNA. On Earth, thanks to our atmosphere, our exposure to this type of radiation is about 100 times lower than at the International Space Station (ISS).

Now a new study, published in PNAS , has investigated the effects of space radiation on male reproduction by blasting mouse sperm up to the ISS. The first issue for the researchers was how best to get the sperm up there. They decided to have the sperm freeze-dried, just like instant coffee.

This meant the sperm weighed almost nothing and could be kept at room temperature, ideal for travel on a rocket, or a distant planet. The mouse sperm then spent 288 days on the ISS before coming back to Earth to be compared with fresh sperm from the same mice.

First the scientists analysed how space travel affected the integrity of the DNA within the sperm. We know that high levels of fragmentation of sperm DNA is associated with male infertility. As expected, the scientists discovered that the space sperm had higher amounts of fragmented DNA than the sperm which had stayed on Earth.

However, when used to fertilise a mouse egg, the space sperm resulted in a similar number of healthy embryos being generated – and these offspring had the ability to develop into normal, fertile adult mice.

A final test the researchers did was to compare the patterns of genes being expressed within the brains of the adult mice. Here, the researchers saw no overall differences and concluded the space sperm were equally capable of generating offspring. The minimal effect on fertility in these highly controlled studies seems to match observations on the fertility of astronauts coming back from space.

However, this is the first study to look directly at how space travel damages sperm. So it seems short-term space travel is OK for sperm quality. It somehow seemed that the damaged space sperm was «repaired» when fertilising the egg, which was from young, healthy mice.

This suggests eggs can compensate for sperm of poorer quality, mending damaged DNA and ensuring the development of the embryo. However, it would be interesting to see whether eggs, which have been into space, would also mend poor quality sperm just as well. Lab mouse. Rama/wikipedia , CC BY-SA Indeed, if humans are to colonise another planet, both men and women will be needed. Another factor to think about is age. With increasing age comes increasing DNA damage to our cells. Unfortunately, as eggs age, their ability to repair damaged DNA , either their own or that of the sperm, decreases.

How long is 1 day in space?

The definition of a day is the amount of time it takes an astronomical object to complete one full spin on its axis. The Earth is the only planet with an approximately 24-hour day.

Planet Length of Day
Earth 23 hours, 56 minutes
Mars 24 hours, 37 minutes
Jupiter 9 hours, 55 minutes
Saturn 10 hours, 33 minutes

.

Do you age in space?

How Long To Travel To The Moon Training on the simulated martian terrain of Mars-500. Scientists have recently observed for the first time that, on an epigenetic level, astronauts age more slowly during long-term simulated space travel than they would have if their feet had been planted on Planet Earth. How Long To Travel To The Moon Jamaji Nwanaji-Enwerem «Many of us assume that being exposed to radiation or other harm in space would be reflected by increased aging. But there’s also been a lot of research that has shown the opposite,» said Jamaji C. Nawanaji-Enwerem, Berkeley Public Health postdoctoral fellow and first author of a study published in Cell Reports in November 2020. The study reviewed data from the six participants of the Mars-500 mission, a simulated space travel and residence experiment launched by the European Space Agency in 2010.

In space, people usually experience environmental stressors like microgravity, cosmic radiation, and social isolation, which can all impact aging. Studies on long-term space travel often measure aging biomarkers such as telomere length and heartbeat rates, not epigenetic aging.

To fill in the gap, Nawanaji-Enwerem and his team members took the novel step to look at epigenetic biomarkers such as DNAmPhenoAge, a robust marker of disease risk, and DNAmGrimAGE, a predictor of mortality risk. The findings show that space mission duration will lead to a slower aging process, which looks like a good thing. How Long To Travel To The Moon Professor Andres Cardenas «It also informs future research in terms of what biomarkers of aging are important to measure,» said Andres Cardenas , study co-author and assistant professor of Environmental Health Sciences at Berkeley Public Health. During the Mars-500 experiment, six astronaut crews stayed in an isolated space and lived as if they were on Mars for 520 days. Cosmic radiation and microgravity were not replicated in the experiment, so the slower aging process found by scientists is caused by social isolation and other relative effects.

«But if the mission goes on for longer, it can actually be a bad thing for you,» said Nawanaji-Enwerem. Although it’s not clear why space travel would lead to slower epigenetic aging, the findings will be valuable for understanding the health implications for future space travel.

«It’s not if, but when, we’re going to transition to space living,» said Cardenas. Read the full report in Cell Reports.

Do we age faster in space?

Flying through outer space has dramatic effects on the body, and people in space experience aging at a faster rate than people on Earth.

Ссылка на основную публикацию
Adblock
detector